Bill Cook (Murillo Pyramid Rank = #84)
Adjusted Stats
1926-1927 NYR 82 GP 95 goals 11 assists 106 points 1.29 PPG
1927-1928 NYR* 80 GP 54 goals 18 assists 72 points 0.90 PPG
1928-1929 NYR 80 GP 59 goals 31 assists 90 points 1.13 PPG
1929-1930 NYR 82 GP 56 goals 58 assists 114 points 1.40 PPG
1930-1931 NYR 80 GP 72 goals 29 assists 100 points 1.25 PPG
1931-1932 NYR 82 GP 72 goals 30 assists 101 points 1.23 PPG
1932-1933 NYR* 82 GP 65 goals 51 assists 115 points 1.41 PPG
1933-1934 NYR 82 GP 28 goals 28 assists 57 points 0.69 PPG
1934-1935 NYR 82 GP 44 goals 31 assists 75 points 0.92 PPG
1935-1936 NYR 75 GP 17 goals 24 assists 41 points 0.55 PPG
1936-1937 NYR 36 GP 2 goals 9 assists 11 points 0.30 PPG
Adjusted Playoff Stats
1926-1927 NYR 2 GP 2 goals 0 assists 2 points 0.89 PPG
1927-1928 NYR* 9 GP 4 goals 6 assists 10 points 1.10 PPG
1928-1929 NYR 6 GP 0 goals 0 assists 0 points 0.00 PPG
1929-1930 NYR 4 GP 0 goals 1 assist 1 point 0.37 PPG
1930-1931 NYR 4 GP 4 goals 0 assists 4 points 1.05 PPG
1931-1932 NYR 7 GP 3 goals 3 assists 6 points 0.91 PPG
1932-1933 NYR* 8 GP 4 goals 3 assists 7 points 0.86 PPG
1933-1934 NYR 2 GP 0 goals 0 assists 0 points 0.00 PPG
1934-1935 NYR 4 GP 2 goals 3 assists 5 points 1.25 PPG
Career - 843 GP, 564 goals, 320 assists, 882 points, 1.05 PPG
Career-Highs - 95 goals (26-27); 58 assists (29-30); 115 points (32-33); 1.41 PPG (32-33)
Avg. (11 seasons) - 77 GP, 51 goals, 29 assists, 80 points, 1.05 PPG
Peak Avg. (26-34) - 81 GP, 63 goals, 32 assists, 94 points, 1.16 PPG, 2 Cups
Playoff Career - 46 GP, 19 goals, 16 assists, 35 points, 0.76 PPG
Playoff-Highs - 4 goals (30-31); 6 assists (27-28); 10 points (27-28); 1.25 PPG (34-35)
Accolades - None
All-Star Teams - 3-time 1st-team, 1-time 2nd-team
2-time Stanley Cup Champion
One of the pleasures of compiling this list has been unearthing some of the buried treasures of NHL history. Bill Cook is a prime example. I knew almost nothing about him, and had only heard of him once or twice, perhaps during Rangers broadcasts when they mentioned past Ranger greats. How surprising then to discover that the man was no less than the greatest right-winger of his era (or perhaps a close second to Charlie Conacher).
All he did was average a staggering 68 goals and 100 points for his first seven seasons, making the first all-star team the first three seasons they existed (and surely he would have made them the previous four years as well) and winning two Stanley Cups along the way. He led the league in goals scored three times. Granted, we are talking about a completely different era (the goals-to-assists ratios of this era's stars are laughable...probably due to the fact that there were no forward passes allowed!). But as has been discussed before, all you can do is be the best of the era you're part of, and Cook was certainly one of the best.
By all objective criteria, Cook should be ranked higher than his most appropriately comparable player, Charlie Conacher. So why isn't he? Conacher led the league in goal scoring five times to Cook's three, and won one Stanley Cup, while Cook had two. Surely they should be closer than twenty-three spots apart?
Well, every single list of great players that I see ranks Conacher, Busher Jackson and Aurele Joliat higher than Cook. I didn't see any of them play, so all I can go on is the (hopefully not deteriorating) memories of the old-timers who watched them. Cook's name isn't as well known as the other stars of his era (Morenz, Shore, Conacher). I'm assuming there's a reason for that, but strictly looking at the numbers and accolades, Cook's career was one for any age.
No comments:
Post a Comment