Mats Sundin (Murillo Pyramid Rank = #73)
Adjusted Stats
1990-1991 Que 82 GP 21 goals 33 assists 54 points 0.66 PPG
1991-1992 Que 82 GP 30 goals 39 assists 69 points 0.84 PPG
1992-1993 Que 78 GP 39 goals 55 assists 94 points 1.21 PPG
1993-1994 Que 82 GP 30 goals 49 assists 79 points 0.96 PPG
1994-1995 Tor 80 GP 40 goals 42 assists 83 points 1.03 PPG
1995-1996 Tor 76 GP 32 goals 49 assists 81 points 1.07 PPG
1996-1997 Tor 82 GP 43 goals 56 assists 99 points 1.21 PPG
1997-1998 Tor 82 GP 38 goals 48 assists 86 points 1.05 PPG
1998-1999 Tor 82 GP 36 goals 61 assists 97 points 1.18 PPG
1999-2000 Tor 73 GP 36 goals 46 assists 82 points 1.12 PPG
2000-2001 Tor 82 GP 31 goals 51 assists 83 points 1.01 PPG
2001-2002 Tor 82 GP 48 goals 46 assists 94 points 1.15 PPG
2002-2003 Tor 75 GP 43 goals 41 assists 83 points 1.11 PPG
2003-2004 Tor 81 GP 37 goals 53 assists 90 points 1.11 PPG
2005-2006 Tor 70 GP 32 goals 48 assists 79 points 1.13 PPG
2006-2007 Tor 75 GP 29 goals 52 assists 81 points 1.08 PPG
2007-2008 Tor 74 GP 36 goals 52 assists 88 points 1.19 PPG
2008-2009 Van 41 GP 10 goals 21 assists 30 points 0.74 PPG
Adjusted Playoff Stats
1992-1993 Que 6 GP 2 goals 1 assist 3 points 0.55 PPG
1994-1995 Tor 7 GP 4 goals 4 assists 8 points 1.14 PPG
1995-1996 Tor 6 GP 3 goals 1 assist 4 points 0.64 PPG
1998-1999 Tor 17 GP 9 goals 9 assists 18 points 1.03 PPG
1999-2000 Tor 12 GP 4 goals 6 assists 10 points 0.80 PPG
2000-2001 Tor 11 GP 7 goals 8 assists 15 points 1.38 PPG
2001-2002 Tor 8 GP 2 goals 6 assists 8 points 1.04 PPG
2002-2003 Tor 7 GP 1 goal 4 assists 5 points 0.68 PPG
2003-2004 Tor 9 GP 5 goals 6 assists 11 points 1.28 PPG
2008-2009 Van 8 GP 3 goals 5 assists 8 points 1.03 PPG
Career - 1379 GP, 611 goals, 842 assists, 1452 points, 1.05 PPG
Career-Highs - 48 goals (01-02); 61 assists (98-99); 99 points (96-97); 1.21 PPG (96-97)
Avg. (18 seasons) - 77 GP, 34 goals, 47 assists, 81 points, 1.05 PPG
Peak Avg. (96-04) - 80 GP, 39 goals, 50 assists, 89 points, 1.12 PPG, 0 Cups
Playoff Career - 91 GP, 40 goals, 50 assists, 90 points, 0.99 PPG
Playoff-Highs - 9 goals (98-99); 9 assists (98-99); 18 points (98-99); 1.38 PPG (00-01)
Accolades - None
All-Star Teams - 2-time 2nd-team
Never Won Stanley Cup
It's funny that the very consistency that is so admired and revered in Nicklas Lidstrom is viewed as something of a detriment in the career of his fellow Swede Mats Sundin. By all standards of effort, consistency and leadership, Mats Sundin's was an excellent career. For a span of fifteen straight seasons, Sundin had at least 80 points in all but two years, in which he had 79. For fourteen seasons in a row, he had thirty or more goals. And yet, Sundin never once eclipsed the 100-point mark...he was relentlessly within his 80-90 point range, never beneath, but never above. Admirable consistency indeed when you are a multiple Stanley Cup winner, but frustratingly incomplete when you fall short. Such is the unfair criticism that comes towards individuals who are being judged within a team game.
Having lived in Southern Ontario for all of my life and watched the Maple Leafs for the past fifteen years (though with the distant observation that comes from not being a Leaf fan), it`s fair to say that Sundin is the star player who I have probably seen more than any other. I remember vividly the different phases of Sundin`s career, and also how the Toronto fans (among the most consistently ignorant in the NHL in my opinion) reacted to Sundin.
Sundin entered the league with the Quebec Nordiques. He was a big, physically strong center (Sundin was perhaps the best player, other than Jagr, at carrying the puck behind the opponent`s net, bringing it out in front from the other side, and unleashing a deadly backhand). Along with Joe Sakic, Sundin formed an excellent 1-2 punch for the Nordiques, yet unlike the Sakic-Forsberg combination that would follow years later, the combination didn`t lead to much team success for Quebec. So the Nordiques took a chance and traded Sundin for the Maple Leafs` hometown hero Wendel Clark.
This is critical when attempting to understand how Sundin was viewed for the first few years (and for some Leaf fans, for the entirety) of his stint with the Maple Leafs. Clark was a treasure in Toronto, for reasons largely unknown to me, and Sundin would forever be in Clark`s shadow and in the shadow of Doug Gilmour. For the first few years of Sundin`s stint with the Maple Leafs, he could do no right. It didn`t matter that he finished in the top five in scoring (in 1996-1997) or that he proved his consistency night in and night out...the team wasn`t winning, and it had to be Sundin`s fault. He had changed a winning atmosphere.
Then, with the dawn of the 2000s, things began to change. In the 2001 semifinals against New Jersey, Sundin was a man possessed, nearly singlehandedly willing the Leafs back to the Conference Finals (Toronto was up 3-2 on the Devils, but a Tie Domi cheapshot against Scott Niedermayer seemed to change the momentum...added to the fact that Curtis Joseph couldn`t close out the series with even mediocre play). Sundin had now proven he could take his game to the next level in the playoffs, and for a good two or three years, it seemed as if whenever the Leafs needed a clutch goal to tie the game or win it in overtime, Sundin was there.
But alas, it being the Maple Leafs, Sundin would never drink from Lord Stanley`s mug. In 2008, after countless more seasons of producing 80+ points for a team that was clearly headed in the wrong direction, Sundin held the city hostage with his decision on whether or not to retire. When he did decide to return, but with the Vancouver Canucks, Sundin`s popularity dipped once again in the city that never fully embraced him in the first place. And his quest for the Cup in Vancouver didn`t pan out...Sundin looked noticeably older and out of step, and although he averaged a point a game in the playoffs, it was clear that retirement was the only option left.
So Sundin`s legacy is final now, yet still difficult to pin down. There are some (like Bob McCown) who believe that if he had pushed himself even harder, Sundin might have been a truly elite player. I believe Sundin worked as hard as he could, and indeed had a very good career (he made the 2nd all-star team twice). And given how Sundin performed in the playoffs, and then for Sweden in their gold medal Olympic effort in 2006, it`s clear that he had it within him to step up for the big game (he wasn`t a Joe Thornton in other words). But if you spend the bulk of your career with the Toronto Maple Leafs and you weren`t born before 1950, there`s going to be a certain degree of failure attached to you. This is the sad reality that engulfed Sundin. I`ll remember him as a great player for his consistency and reliability, but not as an elite star. He's the Jim Rice of hockey, a star player who was unfortunate to toil for a team that is cursed.
No comments:
Post a Comment