Eddie Shore (Murillo Pyramid Rank = #32)
Adjusted Stats
1926-1927 Bos 75 GP 34 goals 17 assists 52 points 0.69 PPG
1927-1928 Bos 80 GP 33 goals 18 assists 51 points 0.64 PPG
1928-1929 Bos* 73 GP 47 goals 27 assists 75 points 1.03 PPG
1929-1930 Bos 78 GP 23 goals 37 assists 60 points 0.77 PPG
1930-1931 Bos 82 GP 36 goals 38 assists 74 points 0.90 PPG
1931-1932 Bos 77 GP 19 goals 27 assists 46 points 0.60 PPG
1932-1933 Bos 82 GP 18 goals 62 assists 81 points 0.99 PPG
1933-1934 Bos 51 GP 4 goals 22 assists 26 points 0.51 PPG
1934-1935 Bos 82 GP 15 goals 54 assists 69 points 0.84 PPG
1935-1936 Bos 77 GP 7 goals 39 assists 46 points 0.60 PPG
1936-1937 Bos 34 GP 6 goals 2 assists 9 points 0.25 PPG
1937-1938 Bos 82 GP 6 goals 29 assists 35 points 0.43 PPG
1938-1939 Bos* 75 GP 8 goals 29 assists 37 points 0.50 PPG
1939-1940 Bos/NYA 24 GP 8 goals 8 assists 17 points 0.70 PPG
Adjusted Stats
1926-1927 Bos 8 GP 2 goals 2 assists 4 points 0.44 PPG
1927-1928 Bos 2 GP 0 goals 0 assists 0 points 0.00 PPG
1928-1929 Bos* 5 GP 2 goals 2 assists 5 points 0.95 PPG
1929-1930 Bos 6 GP 1 goal 0 assists 1 point 0.25 PPG
1930-1931 Bos 5 GP 3 goals 1 assist 4 points 0.84 PPG
1932-1933 Bos 5 GP 1 goal 0 assists 1 point 0.28 PPG
1934-1935 Bos 4 GP 0 goals 2 assists 2 points 0.42 PPG
1935-1936 Bos 2 GP 1 goal 1 assist 2 points 1.11 PPG
1937-1938 Bos 3 GP 0 goals 1 assist 1 point 0.42 PPG
1938-1939 Bos* 12 GP 0 goals 6 assists 6 points 0.46 PPG
1939-1940 NYA 3 GP 0 goals 3 assists 3 points 0.89 PPG
Career - 972 GP, 264 goals, 409 assists, 678 points, 0.70 PPG
Career-Highs - 47 goals (28-29); 62 assists (32-33); 81 points (32-33); 1.03 PPG (28-29)
Avg. (14 seasons) - 69 GP, 19 goals, 29 assists, 48 points, 0.70 PPG
Peak Avg. (27-35) - 76 GP, 24 goals, 36 assists, 60 points, 0.80 PPG, 1 Cup
Playoff Career - 55 GP, 10 goals, 18 assists, 29 points, 0.53 PPG
Playoff-Highs - 3 goals (30-31); 6 assists (38-39); 6 points (38-39); 1.11 PPG (35-36)
Accolades - 4 MVP awards
All-Star Teams - 7-time 1st-team, 1-time 2nd-team
2-time Stanley Cup Champion
As I'll say for every pre-WWII player, it's extremely difficult to figure out where they stand on the pyramid of greats. Go back and read my entry on Howie Morenz...everything that needs saying about the context of the era should be said there.
OK, now that that's out of the way:
What is it with those Bruin defencemen? Ray Bourque, then before him Bobby Orr, and (WAY) before him Eddie Shore. No defenceman in league history has more MVP awards than Eddie Shore. Granted, it was in a bygone era, but four MVP awards is still four MVP awards.
They say the numbers don't tell the whole story with Shore, but the numbers are still pretty fucking good, even to an uncomprehending onlooker like me. During his peak, Shore averaged 60 points while routinely cracking the top three in the league in penalty minutes. So he was an offensive force, a defensive stalwart by all accounts, played nearly the entire game with a few moments on the bench for breathers, and was a mean SOB to top things off.
Shore's meanness wasn't just directed at opponents: gregarious Milt Schmidt often mentions that Shore treated him, and for that matter everyone else, in a noticeably brusque and cold manner. Maybe that's what made Shore great: his competitiveness and focus, his unwillingness to let the niceties of life get in the way of the pursuit of excellence. Or maybe he was just an asshole. Either one's good.
It doesn't matter that I don't quite see it when it comes to Shore's four MVP seasons. The point is, the people who were watching hockey at the time saw it. And to them, it was Shore and Howie Morenz...those were the league's stars. Shore was even referred to as the "Babe Ruth of hockey", an indication of how far-reaching his stardom was.
Can I say much more about him? Nope. I didn't see him play, so I can't directly judge him. How does Shore not crack Level 5 despite his four MVP awards? Well, there's the fact that those seasons are pretty much all Shore has to his credit, the fact that he only won two Stanley Cups in a primarily six or eight-team league, and the evolutionary punishment that he (and many of the other greats of his era) suffer from in my estimation (in other words, they get docked a few points for playing when hockey was in its infancy and the players were, let's face it, not as talented).
Then why does Morenz make it? Well, Morenz had the scoring dominance, another championship to his name, by all accounts truly blazing speed that may have held up even in later eras, and a story (his death following a hockey-related injury) that tugs at the heartstrings. Shore on the other hand was a dick. He was one of the two best players of his era and certainly the best defenceman. But given that it's an era that's nearly impossible to judge, Shore has to settle for the high end of Level 4.
No comments:
Post a Comment