Guy Lafleur (Murillo Pyramid Rank = #16)
Adjusted Stats
1971-1972 Mtl 77 GP 31 goals 37 assists 68 points 0.88 PPG
1972-1973 Mtl* 73 GP 28 goals 27 assists 54 points 0.74 PPG
1973-1974 Mtl 77 GP 21 goals 35 assists 57 points 0.74 PPG
1974-1975 Mtl 72 GP 49 goals 61 assists 110 points 1.53 PPG
1975-1976 Mtl* 82 GP 52 goals 64 assists 116 points 1.41 PPG
1976-1977 Mtl* 82 GP 53 goals 76 assists 129 points 1.57 PPG
1977-1978 Mtl* 80 GP 57 goals 69 assists 126 points 1.58 PPG
1978-1979 Mtl* 82 GP 47 goals 69 assists 116 points 1.41 PPG
1979-1980 Mtl 76 GP 45 goals 67 assists 112 points 1.51 PPG
1980-1981 Mtl 52 GP 22 goals 35 assists 57 points 1.10 PPG
1981-1982 Mtl 68 GP 21 goals 45 assists 66 points 0.97 PPG
1982-1983 Mtl 70 GP 22 goals 40 assists 62 points 0.89 PPG
1983-1984 Mtl 82 GP 24 goals 32 assists 56 points 0.68 PPG
1984-1985 Mtl 19 GP 2 goals 2 assists 4 points 0.21 PPG
1988-1989 NYR 69 GP 15 goals 23 assists 38 points 0.55 PPG
1989-1990 Que 40 GP 10 goals 19 assists 29 points 0.73 PPG
1990-1991 Que 60 GP 11 goals 15 assists 26 points 0.43 PPG
Adjusted Playoff Stats
1971-1972 Mtl 6 GP 1 goal 4 assists 5 points 0.78 PPG
1972-1973 Mtl* 17 GP 3 goals 4 assists 7 points 0.42 PPG
1973-1974 Mtl 6 GP 0 goals 1 assist 1 point 0.16 PPG
1974-1975 Mtl 11 GP 11 goals 6 assists 17 points 1.58 PPG
1975-1976 Mtl* 13 GP 7 goals 10 assists 17 points 1.27 PPG
1976-1977 Mtl* 14 GP 8 goals 15 assists 23 points 1.63 PPG
1977-1978 Mtl* 15 GP 10 goals 11 assists 20 points 1.36 PPG
1978-1979 Mtl* 16 GP 9 goals 12 assists 21 points 1.31 PPG
1979-1980 Mtl 3 GP 3 goals 1 assist 3 points 1.14 PPG
1980-1981 Mtl 3 GP 0 goals 1 assist 1 point 0.24 PPG
1981-1982 Mtl 5 GP 2 goals 1 assist 2 points 0.47 PPG
1982-1983 Mtl 3 GP 0 goals 2 assists 2 points 0.52 PPG
1983-1984 Mtl 12 GP 0 goals 3 assists 3 points 0.22 PPG
1988-1989 NYR 4 GP 1 goal 0 assists 1 point 0.21 PPG
Career - 1161 GP, 510 goals, 716 assists, 1226 points, 1.06 PPG
Career-Highs - 57 goals (77-78); 76 assists (76-77); 129 points (76-77); 1.58 PPG (77-78)
Avg. (17 seasons) - 68 GP, 30 goals, 42 assists, 72 points, 1.06 PPG
Peak Avg. (74-82) - 74 GP, 43 goals, 61 assists, 104 points, 1.40 PPG, 4 Cups
Playoff Career - 128 GP, 55 goals, 71 assists, 123 points, 0.96 PPG
Playoff-Highs - 11 goals (74-75); 15 assists (76-77); 23 points (76-77); 1.63 PPG (76-77)
Accolades - 2 MVP awards, 3 Art Ross, 1 Conn Smythe
All-Star Teams - 6-time 1st-team
5-time Stanley Cup Champion
I suppose in determing where certain players rank on the list of the greatest players of all time comes down to a matter of personal taste. What do you value? Longevity? Consistency of production? Or do you, like me, prefer to see evidence of a player who, for a period of at least five years, dominated the league...someone who's star shone brightly, even if it faded off to soon.
If you're in the latter camp, then Guy Lafleur is one of the all-time greats, no question. He ranks ahead of more consistent plodders like Messier, Francis and Gartner, even though his career totals and averages, while respectable, don't seem to put him in that class. No one, not even the Bruins triumverate of Orr, Esposito and Bucyk, has a greater disparity between their peak years and every other season in their career.
Just look at the gap between Lafleur's magical run from 1974-1980 and the seasons that preceded and followed that span:
Six Peak Years - 79 GP, 51 goals, 68 assists, 118 points, 1.50 PPG, 4 Cups
Every Other Year - 62 GP, 19 goals, 28 assists, 47 points, 0.75 PPG, 1 Cup
It's essentially two different players. So what explains it? The common wisdom is that Lafleur's lackluster early years were a product of his not fully reaching his potential: he had the skillset to make him the first overall draft pick of the 1971 entry draft, but didn't have the work ethic to develop those skills into those of an elite NHL player. And as for the dropoff in the later years? In a word: booze. Lafleur was well known for living the high life during the late 1970s, and it evidently caught up to him, causing a noticeable decline while he was still relatively young.
Lafleur's decline effectively ended the Canadiens' dynasty. With them relying on a now unproductive superstar, there was no way the Canadiens could realistically compete with the up-and-coming Islanders and Oilers. Lafleur battled his way through injuries in the 1984-1985 season before announcing a lackluster retirement, but he was able to come out of retirement for three more years in the late 1980s. The image of Lafleur in a Rangers (and then Nordiques) uniform may have tarnished some's memory of the man, but at least it allowed Lafleur a proper sendoff.
So again, it comes back to what we value: sustained consistency or brief magic. Among the list of right-wingers, I might be inclined to give the slight edge to Jagr, since he put up Lafleur-like numbers for a longer period of time, but there's also no denying that Lafleur was integral to four championship teams, while Jagr only has two to his name (and they were more due to Mario Lemieux's excellence). And I would certainly take Lafleur's six-year run as the best player in the league over someone like Messier, who was a top-ten player for a good chunk of time, but never once would be mistaken for top five. It wasn't for a very long time, but when he was at his best, there were few better than Guy Lafleur.
No comments:
Post a Comment