Ray Bourque (Murillo Pyramid Rank = #10)
1979-1980 Bos 82 GP 15 goals 43 assists 58 points 0.71 PPG
1980-1981 Bos 69 GP 22 goals 24 assists 46 points 0.67 PPG
1981-1982 Bos 67 GP 13 goals 38 assists 52 points 0.78 PPG
1982-1983 Bos 67 GP 18 goals 42 assists 60 points 0.89 PPG
1983-1984 Bos 80 GP 25 goals 52 assists 77 points 0.96 PPG
1984-1985 Bos 75 GP 16 goals 54 assists 70 points 0.93 PPG
1985-1986 Bos 76 GP 15 goals 46 assists 61 points 0.81 PPG
1986-1987 Bos 80 GP 20 goals 62 assists 82 points 1.02 PPG
1987-1988 Bos 80 GP 14 goals 54 assists 69 points 0.86 PPG
1988-1989 Bos 62 GP 15 goals 36 assists 51 points 0.84 PPG
1989-1990 Bos 78 GP 16 goals 56 assists 72 points 0.92 PPG
1990-1991 Bos 78 GP 19 goals 67 assists 86 points 1.10 PPG
1991-1992 Bos 82 GP 19 goals 54 assists 73 points 0.89 PPG
1992-1993 Bos 76 GP 16 goals 52 assists 68 points 0.89 PPG
1993-1994 Bos 70 GP 19 goals 66 assists 84 points 1.20 PPG
1994-1995 Bos 79 GP 21 goals 55 assists 76 points 0.96 PPG
1995-1996 Bos 82 GP 20 goals 61 assists 80 points 0.98 PPG
1996-1997 Bos 62 GP 20 goals 33 assists 53 points 0.76 PPG
1997-1998 Bos 82 GP 15 goals 41 assists 56 points 0.68 PPG
1998-1999 Bos 81 GP 12 goals 55 assists 67 points 0.82 PPG
1999-2000 Bos/Col 79 GP 20 goals 38 assists 58 points 0.74 PPG
2000-2001 Col* 80 GP 8 goals 58 assists 66 points 0.82 PPG
Adjusted Playoff Stats
1979-1980 Bos 10 GP 2 goals 8 assists 9 points 0.94 PPG
1980-1981 Bos 3 GP 0 goals 1 assist 1 point 0.24 PPG
1981-1982 Bos 9 GP 1 goal 4 assists 5 points 0.52 PPG
1982-1983 Bos 17 GP 6 goals 12 assists 18 points 1.06 PPG
1983-1984 Bos 3 GP 0 goals 2 assists 2 points 0.59 PPG
1984-1985 Bos 5 GP 0 goals 2 assists 2 points 0.45 PPG
1985-1986 Bos 3 GP 0 goals 0 assists 0 points 0.00 PPG
1986-1987 Bos 4 GP 1 goal 2 assists 3 points 0.67 PPG
1987-1988 Bos 23 GP 2 goals 14 assists 16 points 0.69 PPG
1988-1989 Bos 10 GP 0 goals 3 assists 3 points 0.34 PPG
1989-1990 Bos 17 GP 4 goals 10 assists 14 points 0.85 PPG
1990-1991 Bos 19 GP 6 goals 15 assists 21 points 1.12 PPG
1991-1992 Bos 12 GP 3 goals 5 assists 8 points 0.66 PPG
1992-1993 Bos 4 GP 1 goal 0 assists 1 point 0.21 PPG
1993-1994 Bos 13 GP 2 goals 8 assists 10 points 0.76 PPG
1994-1995 Bos 5 GP 0 goals 3 assists 3 points 0.53 PPG
1995-1996 Bos 5 GP 1 goal 6 assists 7 points 1.34 PPG
1997-1998 Bos 6 GP 1 goal 4 assists 6 points 0.93 PPG
1998-1999 Bos 12 GP 1 goal 10 assists 11 points 0.91 PPG
1999-2000 Col 13 GP 1 goal 10 assists 11 points 0.83 PPG
2000-2001 Col* 21 GP 5 goals 7 assists 12 points 0.56 PPG
Career - 1667 GP, 378 goals, 1087 assists, 1465 points, 0.88 PPG
Career-Highs - 25 goals (83-84); 67 assists (90-91); 86 points (90-91); 1.20 PPG (93-94)
Avg. (22 seasons) - 76 GP, 17 goals, 49 assists, 67 points, 0.88 PPG
Peak Avg. (89-97) - 76 GP, 19 goals, 56 assists, 74 points, 0.98 PPG, 0 Cups
Playoff Career - 214 GP, 37 goals, 126 assists, 163 points, 0.76 PPG
Career-Highs - 6 goals (82-83); 15 assists (90-91); 21 points (90-91); 1.34 PPG (95-96)
Accolades - 5 Norris Trophies, Calder
All-Star Teams - 13-time 1st-team, 6-time 2nd-team
1-time Stanley Cup Champion
The most heartbroken I have ever been as a hockey fan was in the spring/early summer of 2001. The New Jersey Devils, my favourite team and the defending Stanley Cup champions, were up 3-2 in the '01 Cup Final against the Colorado Avalanche. They were heading back to New Jersey. It seemed like they were going to accomplish the rare repeat championship. Then they laid an egg, losing 4-0 at home, and it was back to Denver for Game Seven, and it was really never in doubt. The Avalanche easily won, their franchise's second championship instead of the Devils' third, and that was that.
But as crushed as I was by that series (and believe me, this was at the height of my Devilsmania, when the superstitions I had compiled had me spending a good portion of each day in religious preparation for a playoff game), it did have a silver lining: Raymond Bourque, the best defenceman of the 1990s (and possibly a good chunk of the 1980s), in his twenty-second and (it would prove-to-be) final season, finally had his first Cup championship.
Essentially, you can take everything I said about Nik Lidstrom above and apply it to Bourque...they're basically the same player. How I would rank the two in comparison to one another could change with the flip of a coin. I give the slightest of edges to Lidstrom simply because he was fortunate to be the backbone of an elite team that won four championships over twelve years, while Bourque was the reliable backstop for a good-but-never-great Bruins team that always made the playoffs, and never won anything.
Bourque's numbers and accomplishments are eerily similar to Lidstrom's: the longevity, the consistency, the Norris trophies (five to Lidstrom's six). Where Bourque has Lidstrom beat, and indeed pretty much everyone beat, is his appearance on year-end all-star teams: an incredible thirteen first-team appearances and six second-team appearaces. Let that sink in for a bit: in twenty-two of the seasons he played, Bourque was considered one of the two best defencemen in the league 13 times, and one of the four best 6 times.
That's why Bourque's Cup drought was indeed so tragic. Imagine if Nicklas Lidstrom, after all his years of service with the Red Wings, had never won a fucking Cup and was nearing retirement! No one begrudges Bourque's decision to accept the trade to the Colorado Avalanche. And contrary to people's hazy memory, Bourque's Cup with the Avalanche wasn't of the rent-a-player variety. It's not like he went to the Avs for two months + a playoff run. In his first year with the Avalanche, they fell short, losing in the Conference finals. It was only the next season that they finally got it done for Ray. So Bourque was a part of the championship team from the beginning of training camp until the end of the playoffs. And he was no slouch: 66 points, yet another appearance on the NHL's first all-star team, and a Norris nomination.
Bourque's career +/- is the third highest of all-time, behind Larry Robinson and Bobby Orr. And in many ways, it may be more impressive than Lidstrom, because Lidstrom's teams were undoubtably more consistently talented than Bourque's throughout the years. So Bourque was the consummate defenceman: never making a glaring mistake, steady, with incredible passing vision, an insanely accurate shot (remember those All-Star competitions he kept winning), and a quiet ability to lead. He belongs on the list of the best players to ever play the game.
No comments:
Post a Comment