Jaromir Jagr (Murillo Pyramid Rank = #12)
Adjusted Stats
1990-1991 Pit* 82 GP 25 goals 27 assists 52 points 0.63 PPG
1991-1992 Pit* 72 GP 29 goals 34 assists 63 points 0.87 PPG
1992-1993 Pit 79 GP 28 goals 50 assists 78 points 0.98 PPG
1993-1994 Pit 78 GP 30 goals 62 assists 92 points 1.17 PPG
1994-1995 Pit 82 GP 56 goals 67 assists 123 points 1.50 PPG
1995-1996 Pit 82 GP 61 goals 85 assists 146 points 1.78 PPG
1996-1997 Pit 63 GP 50 goals 51 assists 100 points 1.59 PPG
1997-1998 Pit 77 GP 41 goals 78 assists 119 points 1.54 PPG
1998-1999 Pit 81 GP 51 goals 97 assists 148 points 1.83 PPG
1999-2000 Pit 63 GP 47 goals 60 assists 107 points 1.71 PPG
2000-2001 Pit 81 GP 58 goals 77 assists 135 points 1.67 PPG
2001-2002 Wsh 69 GP 36 goals 56 assists 93 points 1.34 PPG
2002-2003 Wsh 75 GP 42 goals 47 assists 89 points 1.19 PPG
2003-2004 Wsh/NYR 77 GP 37 goals 51 assists 89 points 1.15 PPG
2005-2006 NYR 82 GP 55 goals 70 assists 125 points 1.52 PPG
2006-2007 NYR 82 GP 32 goals 70 assists 103 points 1.25 PPG
2007-2008 NYR 82 GP 28 goals 52 assists 80 points 0.98 PPG
Adjusted Playoff Stats
1990-1991 Pit* 24 GP 3 goals 9 assists 11 points 0.46 PPG
1991-1992 Pit* 21 GP 10 goals 11 assists 21 points 1.00 PPG
1992-1993 Pit 12 GP 4 goals 3 assists 7 points 0.62 PPG
1993-1994 Pit 6 GP 2 goals 4 assists 6 points 0.98 PPG
1994-1995 Pit 12 GP 9 goals 4 assists 13 points 1.10 PPG
1995-1996 Pit 18 GP 11 goals 11 assists 22 points 1.22 PPG
1996-1997 Pit 5 GP 4 goals 4 assists 8 points 1.68 PPG
1997-1998 Pit 6 GP 4 goals 6 assists 10 points 1.67 PPG
1998-1999 Pit 9 GP 5 goals 8 assists 13 points 1.46 PPG
1999-2000 Pit 11 GP 10 goals 10 assists 19 points 1.75 PPG
2000-2001 Pit 16 GP 2 goals 12 assists 14 points 0.88 PPG
2002-2003 Wsh 6 GP 2 goals 6 assists 8 points 1.39 PPG
2005-2006 NYR 3 GP 0 goals 1 assists 1 point 0.33 PPG
2006-2007 NYR 10 GP 6 goals 7 assists 12 points 1.25 PPG
2007-2008 NYR 10 GP 5 goals 10 assists 16 points 1.57 PPG
Career - 1307 GP, 706 goals, 1034 assists, 1742 points, 1.33 PPG
Career-Highs - 61 goals (95-96); 97 assists (98-99); 148 points (98-99); 1.83 PPG (98-99)
Avg. (17 seasons) - 77 GP, 42 goals, 61 assists, 102 points, 1.33 PPG
Peak Avg. (94-02) - 75 GP, 50 goals, 71 assists, 121 points, 1.62 PPG, 0 Cups
Playoff Career - 169 GP, 77 goals, 106 assists, 181 points, 1.07 PPG
Playoff-Highs - 11 goals (95-96); 12 assists (00-01); 22 points (95-96); 1.75 PPG (99-00)
Accolades - 1 MVP award, 5 Art Ross
All-Star Teams - 7-time 1st-team, 1-time 2nd-team
2-time Stanley Cup Champion
There is a case to be made that, aside from the Pantheon names of Wayne Gretzky, Bobby Orr and Mario Lemieux, Jaromir Jagr is the best offensive player ever to play in the NHL. This surprises many, but the facts are too numerous to ignore:
- His 1,742 career adjusted points rank him fifth behind just Wayne Gretzky, Gordie Howe, Mark Messier and Ron Francis. For the record, Messier and Francis each played about 500 more games than Jagr. If Jagr averaged 10 points a season for just three more seasons, a scorching Tie Domi pace, he's ahead of them.
- His average of 102 adjusted points per season played is second only to The Great One...and along with Gretzky, he's the only player to average over 100 points a season. This of course means that Jagr holds the highest average of any non-center.
- His peak average of 121 points per season ranks third, behind just Gretzky and Esposito; and his peak-average PPG ranks third behind just Gretzky and Lemieux.
- He won the Art Ross Trophy five times as the league's leading scorer.
Jagr benefits from the adjusted-stats more than most players, because the fact is that his prime, when he was tearing up the league, occurred from 1994-2002, at the peak of the Trap Era, when players with 80 points in a season would routinely crack the top ten and even the top five. It also didn't help Jagr and his fellow forwards that the Trap Era also boasted the best era of goaltending we've seen (Roy, Brodeur, Belfour, Hasek and Joseph were all at their best during these years). In spite of all this, Jagr managed to put up remarkable numbers.
By objective criteria, Jagr is clearly in the top twenty players of all-time, and perhaps deserves consideration for the top ten (he's outside my top ten, but still within the 11-15 range...and ahead of Messier in my eyes, which shocks many). Among right-wingers, Howe clearly bests him, as does Richard for his legendary status and fierce competitiveness. Lafleur's peak was equal to Jagr's, but unlike Jagr, Lafleur fell off the map after his peak.
So the case has been made, and yet...and yet...there is something about Jagr that, particularly among Canadians, doesn't seem to qualify him for the discussion of the greatest players of all time. Part of it may be the fact that, although Jagr won two Stanley Cups, they were at the beginning of his career, and they were certainly far more the product of Lemieux's dominance. No one who saw the Cup finals against Chicago can doubt that Jagr was also integral to their championship.
(By the way, in case you've forgotten: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6u1f1F5xAU)
Still, while Jagr was at his peak, as the best player in the league (or perhaps second-best, to Peter Forsberg), he never led the Penguins to a Cup championship. And then there was the fact that he seemed to quit on the team during the 2001 Conference Finals against the Devils...remember him skating off before the period was over?
This gets at the heart of a prejudice many Canadians have about European players: that they don't fully compete at all times. Certainly, there may be truth to this, and Jagr was known for being erratic and mercurial (his career playoff PPG, while still excellent, is a full quarter-PPG lower than his regular season output), but we shouldn't let this blanket assessment tarnish Jagr's accomplishments. I still vividly remember the 7th-seeded Penguins upsetting the heavily-favoured Devils in the 1999 quarterfinals, in which Jagr took the team on his back and led a bunch of ragtags far past where they deserved to be. The reality is, the Penguins simply weren't very good when Jagr was in his prime, and yet he led them to the playoffs over and over again, and many times past the first round. Just look at the Penguins' immediate dropoff after Jagr left to go to Washington...they languished as one of the worst teams in the league (although that paid off in the form of Fleury, Crosby and Malkin).
There was also no doubt that Jagr's game wasn't as well-rounded as, say, Peter Forsberg's...but as with the Gretzky argument, I'll grant that although Jagr was a bit of a cherry-picker, his philosophy was certainly that "the best defence is a good offence". And considering that Jagr's career +/- is +275 (on Penguins teams that featured goalies like Ken Wreggat and a past-his-prime Tom Barrasso), it's clear that Jagr succeeded in keeping the puck out of his own net simply by virtue of the fact that he had it on his stick most of the time.
As for the much-maligned days with the Capitals, there's no doubt that Jagr wasn't as productive or consistent as he was with the Penguins, but it's not like he fell off the map into some Alexei Kovalev-like level of ineptitude. Jagr was still top five in the league in scoring in his first year, and averaged around 90 adjusted points with the Capitals. Not dominant, to be sure, but not bad for a "dip" in his career.
For anyone else who doubts Jagr's commitment to team success, just look at the dominance the Czech Republic displayed on the international scene from 1998-2001. In Nagano, we Canadians had our hearts broken by Hasek, but we shouldn't forget that Jagr was one of the top forwards of the tournament. Basically, the Czech team was Hasek, Jagr, a bunch of players with potential (Straka, Elias), and some scrubs. That's it...unless you count Jiri Slegr, who played way over his head and won top defenceman honours in Nagano.
Jagr cemented his legacy with three excellent seasons with the New York Rangers, in which he led a team that had been languishing out of the playoffs for years back to the Eastern Conference semifinals two years in a row. If not for an astonishing spurt by Joe Thornton after his trade to San Jose, Jagr would have won another scoring title and another MVP award (as a side note, it's interesting that Jagr has one MVP award to his name, but has received three Ted Lindsay awards as the most valuable player as voted by the league's players. Could that be a result of European prejudice among those who do the Hart trophy voting?)
So we can throw backhanded compliments Jagr's way, such as "he was a great individual talent" or "an extremely gifted player", but let's just take a step back and acknowledge him for what he is: one of the best players to ever play right-wing.
No comments:
Post a Comment